diff --git a/Source/Packing/CygonRectanglePacker.cs b/Source/Packing/CygonRectanglePacker.cs
index 4abd0d7..eee6dc9 100644
--- a/Source/Packing/CygonRectanglePacker.cs
+++ b/Source/Packing/CygonRectanglePacker.cs
@@ -41,56 +41,6 @@ namespace Nuclex.Support.Packing {
   /// </remarks>
   public class CygonRectanglePacker : RectanglePacker {
 
-    #if USE_WASTED_AREA
-    // An optimization idea of mine. With this, the packer not only tries to place
-    // rectangles as low in the packing area as possible, it also tried to choose
-    // locations where it doesn't block gaps where other rectangles might still fit
-    // in. This turned out to be counter-productive and a marginal improvement in
-    // space efficiency could be achieved by deliberately choosing positions where
-    // gaps where blocked for future rectangles.
-    //
-    // These are the results of a benchmark with different wastedAreaScoreWeights
-    //
-    //      -10     579.315
-    //       -5     582.140
-    //       -4     582.886
-    //       -3     583.166
-    //       -2     583.792
-    //       -1     583.975 (best)
-    //        0     583.791
-    //        1     583.960
-    //        2     583.469
-    //        3     582.444
-    //        4     580.259
-    //        5     578.400
-    //       10     570.467
-    //
-    // Needless to say, I chose to disable this splendid optimization.
-
-    /// <summary>By how much the wasted area influences a placement's score</summary>
-    /// <remarks>
-    ///   <para>
-    ///     The score of a potential position for a new rectangle is how far the
-    ///     rectangle is from the lower end of the packing area. The lower the
-    ///     score, the better the position.
-    ///   </para>
-    ///   <para>
-    ///     Often, however, it's better to choose a position that's farther from
-    ///     the lower end of the packing area to not block a gap in which a future
-    ///     rectangle might still fit in. To account for this fact, the packer
-    ///     calculates a "wasted area factor", which is the amount of area that
-    ///     would forever go to waste in relation of the area the rectangle has.
-    ///   </para>
-    ///   <para>
-    ///     This value controls the weighting of this wasted area factor in the
-    ///     potential position's score. Finding a value that works well for typical
-    ///     packing problems is a matter of trial and error, as it seems :)
-    ///   </para>
-    /// </remarks>
-    private const int WastedAreaScoreWeight = 10;
-
-    #endif // USE_WASTED_AREA
-
     #region class SliceStartComparer
 
     /// <summary>Compares the starting position of height slices</summary>
@@ -189,32 +139,6 @@ namespace Nuclex.Support.Packing {
         if((highest + rectangleHeight < PackingAreaHeight)) {
           int score = highest;
 
-          #if USE_WASTED_AREA // --------------------------------------------------------
-
-          // Calculate the amount of space that would go to waste if the rectangle
-          // would be placed at this location
-          int wastedArea = 0;
-          for(int index = leftSliceIndex; index < rightSliceIndex - 1; ++index) {
-            int sliceWidth = this.heightSlices[index + 1].X - this.heightSlices[index].X;
-            wastedArea += (highest - this.heightSlices[index].Y) * sliceWidth;
-          }
-          wastedArea +=
-            (highest - this.heightSlices[rightSliceIndex - 1].Y) *
-            (
-              (this.heightSlices[leftSliceIndex].X + rectangleWidth) -
-              this.heightSlices[rightSliceIndex - 1].X
-            );
-
-          // Limit wasted area to the area taken up by the rectangle. This prevents
-          // a "build-up" of wasted area that become more expensive the higher the packing
-          // area is filled.
-          wastedArea = Math.Min(wastedArea, rectangleArea);
-
-          // Alter the score by the amount of wasted area in relation to
-          score += (wastedArea * WastedAreaScoreWeight / rectangleArea);
-
-          #endif // USE_WASTED_AREA -----------------------------------------------------
-
           if(score < bestScore) {
             bestSliceIndex = leftSliceIndex;
             bestSliceY = highest;
diff --git a/Source/Packing/RectanglePacker.Test.cs b/Source/Packing/RectanglePacker.Test.cs
index d4d8c95..fa6db4b 100644
--- a/Source/Packing/RectanglePacker.Test.cs
+++ b/Source/Packing/RectanglePacker.Test.cs
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ namespace Nuclex.Support.Packing {
 
     /// <summary>Delegate for a Rectangle Packer factory method</summary>
     /// <returns>A new rectangle packer</returns>
-    protected delegate RectanglePacker BuildRectanglePacker();
+    protected delegate RectanglePacker RectanglePackerBuilder();
 
     /// <summary>Determines the efficiency of a packer with a packing area of 70x70</summary>
     /// <param name="packer">Packer with a packing area of 70x70 units</param>
@@ -59,14 +59,14 @@ namespace Nuclex.Support.Packing {
     }
 
     /// <summary>Benchmarks the provided rectangle packer using random data</summary>
-    /// <param name="packerBuilder">
-    ///   Rectangle packer builder returning new rectangle packers
+    /// <param name="buildPacker">
+    ///   Rectangle packer build method returning new rectangle packers
     ///   with an area of 1024 x 1024
     /// </param>
     /// <returns>The achieved benchmark score</returns>
-    protected float Benchmark(BuildRectanglePacker packerBuilder) {
+    protected float Benchmark(RectanglePackerBuilder buildPacker) {
       // How many runs to perform for getting a stable average
-      const int averagingRuns = 200;
+      const int averagingRuns = 1;
 
       // Generates the random number seeds. This is used so that each run produces
       // the same number sequences and makes the comparison of different algorithms
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ namespace Nuclex.Support.Packing {
       // Perform a number of  runs to get a semi-stable average score
       for(int averagingRun = 0; averagingRun < averagingRuns; ++averagingRun) {
         Random dimensionGenerator = new Random(seedGenerator.Next());
-        RectanglePacker packer = packerBuilder();
+        RectanglePacker packer = buildPacker();
 
         // Try to cramp as many rectangles into the packing area as possible
         for(;; ++rectanglesPacked) {